It sometimes seems that the internet is governed by different rules from the ones that apply in the off-line world. That's the case with crime detection and privacy, for example, and particularly with intellectual property rights. In 2012, various proposed measures aimed at tackling the abuse of intellectual property rights were shelved at the last moment. They included the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect IP Act, whose privacy implications and other drawbacks were regarded as unacceptable by many. In protest against the legislation, various US websites – including Wikipedia and Boing Boing – were taken down for a day. Ultimately, the bills failed to make it into law. A similar fate befell ACTA (the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement): a treaty designed to harmonise the various systems protecting intellectual property. After fierce protests, the European Union dropped the proposal.
In the Netherlands, the idea of a download ban was put forward, but this suggestion too was withdrawn after heated debate. One measure that did go ahead was the action against Pirate Bay. In 2012, all major internet service providers were ordered by a judge to prevent access to the well-known download site. This prompted vigorous debate about the role of ISPs and the value of such a blockade. SIDN believes that all stakeholders should have